So after watching the results of all of the caucuses, primaries, and town meetings I came to a conclusion....I don't like any of the candidates. Even worse there are no other options, the ones hanging on the fray belong there because they are crazy. I looked at each candidate and was not impressed or did not feel any swell of confidence in any candidate. Now most people ask me in the house what I think or what certain things mean in the political world, naturally because I did graduate with a political science degree. I don't mind answering questions or spewing my opinions, but the thing is I don't care about politics in the sense of campaigns and elections which is what people think of when you say my major. U.S. micro-managing politics and campaigns are boring to me, I don't care what it takes to be a politician, I am interested in what it takes to make a government run or why certain countries have the regimes they do. I am more interested in the philosophy of politcs and nation-state. I will talk more on this later. Back to the current election cycle's campaigning. As I was saying none of the candidates really interest me at this point, even though to be honest Obama is looking better and better. I cannot stand Hillary, not because she IS a woman, but because that is what she is running on. Her platform consists of I am a woman and I am not Bush, congrats I can't wait to vote for you. The Democrats are full of empty promises, which is funny to say because so are the Republicans, but the Dems always promise change and that they will stand up for the little people. Riiigghht, "we'll stop Bush cold in his tracks now that we control the house and senate and the purse strings." Really? I didn't realize rollign over and doing everything Bush wants was resistance (maybe the path of least resistance), but it does dick for any kind of promise or cause they hailed and ran their train of change on. Th Democrats don't know what they stand for, so how could they fight for it other than being anti-republican. Now I am not championing the Republicans either cause they suck too, but they have a straight forward stance on most things. So you know what you are getting when you talk about a Republican platform. You may know what you are getting with the Republicans and I agree with certain ideologies they have, but none of their candidates look good to me. There is Romney who is too much of a polished politician for me to even have a chance, forget about his religion. Ron Paul just looks crazy and his ads have revolution with evol backwards to spell love, give me a break. McCain, eh, I am so-so on him; I don't know really where he stands. Mike Huckabee is really doofy looking and is more known for his eccentricness rather than his actual stance on issues. So right now the Republicans are out, so on to the Democrats. There is Mike Gravel, who is old and has seemingly come out of nowhere. I can't say much on him because I have no idea who he is. I don't enjoy Hillary because she is running on her husband's success, that she is a woman, and she is not Bush. Now the last one may be enough for most of the nation to vote for her, but I will not. She is a very intelligent and motivated woman, but she panders more than I have seen anybody pander before. She changes accents and interests depending on her audience. Now some would say that is effective public speaking and what politicians do, but I can't stand her she is too fake for my taste. Obama is a new guy on trhe block who seems capable of doing the job and not too too fake. So he is looking like the front runner to me personally at the moment (John Edwards will most likely be his running mate). So there really isn't a great choice to me for president this upcoming cycle.
Now onto a different topic, yet related. My issue with my generation of voters. They are completely useless, if P Diddy isn't selling them a t-shirt in order to vote then it won't happen, even then it is a gamble. My generation of voters are given too much credit for being the crusaders of change, unless they start attaching a vote for pres. facebook app. or add it to xbox live, this generation will not vote in the quantities Mtv loves to say we do. 2004 election- this generation was supposed to change the course of history and come out in droves to elect Kerry and kick Bush out of office...hmmm..good job guys (I voted for Bush) stop bitching about how Bush is still in office, maybe if you had voted things would be somewhat different. On a sidenote, one of the guys in the house said he wanted to vote for Huckabee because on New Years instead of going to some political event he went hunting and that meant he was an everyman or a credible candidate. I told him straight to his face that he is someone I don't want with voting power. That is such a hill-billy reason to vote, I bet if Huckabee had a car named the General Lee it would have sweetened the deal for him. It really bothers me, voting isn't hard to do at all. You register there and check off names or flick switches, holy shit that is way too complicated for many it seems. I understand those who can't make it because of work or what have you that would void a person from voting, but the U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnouts out of all industrial democratic countries. A lot of it is laziness. Some blame that stat on the fact that we have the electoral college and a FPP system or first past the post= winner take all; whereas most other countries have proportional systems or mixed party systems. This seems to create a sense of efficacy among voters, they feel that their vote matters because in the prop. system if the candidate beats a certain threshold, most countries are at like 3-5% of the votes, psuedo-democratic countries have higher thresholds in order to monopolize the government and make it harder for the opposition to gain a foothold, they are allowed in the government where our system if 100 votes to 99 votes, those other 99 do not count for anything. So it is a somewhat convincing argument for the different types of systems, but I don't think the other systems would work in this country very well. And the reasons why it wouldn't work in this country is what interests me.
I find what makes up a country, a regime, and it's citizens are what interests me. I love the philosophy behind a nation, not so much the day to day managing of one. Factors such as resource, location, and religion are major determining factors. Such as religion in the Middle East or resource in the Middle East. Both of those factors are huge in why they are autocratic countries. Books such as Plato's The Republic and Symposium are great reads, very tough to get through but very interesting. So I could go on and on, but I think I have tpyed enough for today. Soon enough I will go further into the philosophy of politics and regimes.
Isn't this blog amazing?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment